Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Jurassic World Adoption Movie Review
For twenty years, Jurassic Park has drawn international
crowds to its theme park, which features genetically re-created dinosaurs.
However, attendance has dropped as the crowds have tired of seeing the same old
dinosaurs. Hoping to renew interest in the park, operations manager Claire
Dearing has facilitated the creation of a new dinosaur – the Indominous Rex,
which combines genetic material from several new species into an inventive,
dangerous creature. At the same time, Claire’s sister Karen has sent her two
sons, Zach and Gray to spend time with Claire. When they arrive, Claire is very
busy with the park, and so Zach and Gray are left to attend to themselves and,
later, to fend for themselves.
The Adoption
Connection
It’s not an adoption story, but Zach and Gray are a teen and
pre-teen sibling set that do find themselves far from their parents and with an
aunt that they haven’t seen in several years. Many adoptions – especially within
the foster care system – are within the same family, with a child being cared
for and adopted by a grandparent or an aunt or uncle. Also, the two siblings
need to rely on each other in this unfamiliar situation, which might also
resonate with any sibling sets that have traveled through foster care
together. It also sheds light on how damaging it must be to separate sibling
sets into different foster homes. When the world is so unstable, it’s good to
have at least one person who has been constant throughout your life.
Strong Points
One character affirms that living things have value, not
just functionality. He said it about dinosaurs, but it’s true about people,
too. People (kids, too) don’t exist just to meet others’ needs.
Zach tries to comfort his frightened younger brother. Gray
asks, “Will I be safe.” Zach assures him that earlier in life, “I protect you.
Nothing’s gonna get you when I am around.” Gray challenges, “But you won’t
always be around.” Zach’s response is a promise that he can’t be sure that he
can keep (he’s being chased by a dinosaur, too,) but it is well-intentioned, “Yeah
I am, I’m your brother. We’ll always come back to each other, no matter what.”
It’s a good testament to the power of family – and the power of a sibling bond
in particular.
Challenges
There’s a lot of violence in this one. People get eaten by
dinosaurs. Kids are shown in perilous situations. It could be frightening to young
viewers who have experienced uncontrolled rage and violence earlier in their
lives.
One character comments, “Every living thing in this park is
trying to murder each other.” It’s a pessimistic view of life on earth, but could
be scary to younger viewers.
It’s hinted that Zach’s and Gray’s parents might be about to
get divorced. Gray confides to his older brother that he’s worried about it,
and Zach responds, “It’s not up to you; there’s a point where you have to grow
up.” It doesn’t seem like the theme is revisited afterwards.
One character offers an interesting perspective, “Monster is
a relative term. To a canary, a cat is a monster. We’re just used to being the
cat.” It is helpful to remember that most behaviors make at least some sense
within the context of the behaver’s world, for sure. But, for kids who have
been abused, it might be too early to work on this nuanced view – they might
still need to just hear the simple truth that the person who abused them was
very, very wrong.
Claire is very inattentive – and actually, negligent – to her
nephews. Neglect is one of the main reasons that kids come into foster care.
Weak Points
Claire tells a friend, “It’s OK to lie to people when they
are scared.” While it is good to comfort scared children (and adults), lies are
often found out, and can damage trust. And sometimes, telling someone that a
fear is grounded in reality could help them prepare better, or even avoid a
danger.
Recommendations
Jurassic World might appeal to kids, because kids tend to
love dinosaurs. It’s actually quite violent though, and definitely has earned
its PG-13 rating. It’s probably too scary for most kids under 11. The violence
isn’t particularly realistic, so older kids might be able to handle it,
although it’s still probably a bad choice for kids who’ve experienced violence
previously. It seems best suited to teens 13 and up.
Questions for
Discussion After the Movie
Do you think Zach is a good older brother to Gray?
Have you ever wished that your parent would pay less
attention to you? More attention to you?
What have been some times when you’ve been afraid?
Related Films
*SPOILER ALERTS IN THIS SECTION*
Like in San Andreas, a young protagonist’s parents are on
the verge of divorce, but are brought back together by a shared, traumatic
experience that threatens the life of their child. (Click here for the Adoption Movie Guide of San Andreas)
Like Frozen, this film features a strong, durable sibling
bond. (Click here for the Adoption Movie Review of Frozen)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I thought this movie was fun because the violence was rather over-the-top and almost silly, but the suspense was pretty realistic. But I thought the divorce story line seemed forced in, at best, and wonder what might have gotten cut out that might have made it work. It wasn't necessary to show the brother bond that's been strained by teenaged pulling away but comes back full force when there is danger. That said, I am an adult, and think that this movie definitely deserves its PG-13 rating.
ReplyDeleteThanks Yan. Great points. I felt like the strained nature of the brother bond and its later reconciliation could have been a strong point of the movie, but it wasn't built up very much. I agree with you - PG-13 seemed right for this one.
Delete